Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HX (hip hop producer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Previously salted at HX (record producer) -- Y not? 06:23, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HX (hip hop producer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probable autobio. No evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an autobio, I listed all the sources and references of biography. This artist also meets criteria of notability (7)[1] --Senasot (talk) 11:08, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as non-notable. One self-released album, and a second self-released album "in progress". All listed references are from the website of the company (MAXVOL) that the subject created to promote his own music. No indications of any coverage of this artist in any reliable sources. Also delete as overly promotional. The many repeated attempts to create this article lead me to believe that this author is attempting to use Wikipedia to promote this artist. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:26, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm not trying to promote him, like I said he is a pretty known figure in hip hop and he has no need for promotion. There are references on other websites too but I don't think they're needed for this article. --Senasot (talk) 15:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, as tagged by me, tag removed by article creator. Wht's happened to the bot that replaced these tags?? No credible assertion of notability, ie the 'influental' guff is a quote from what looks like a far-from-rock-solid source. If, as article creator claims, the person is notable, better sources will be available. And are necessary.TheLongTone (talk) 18:45, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete as originally detagged by article creator. (Lack of notability is not a criterion for CSD.) I see no assertion of significance. With due deference to the opinion of the article creator, perhaps he is less well known that the creator thinks. Sourcing is not independent and does not meet WP:V. Subject odes not meet the relevant notability guidelines or the general notability guideline. Dloh cierekim 00:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - notability is not asserted Alex Bakharev (talk) 05:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.