Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gymnastics Results at the 2009-2012

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 18:52, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gymnastics Results at the 2009-2012[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orphaned article that is just an overall list of results. A majority of the items have their own event articles and as a result this is merely an unnecessary directory. —Strange Passerby (t × c) 10:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not familiar with international gymnastics, but 2009-2012 seems like an arbitrary grouping, and as you've noted, much of the content is duplicate. --BDD (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an arbitrary (2009-2012? why?) collection of gymnastics results with no indication as to why they should be grouped together in such a way. -- Whpq (talk) 18:47, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What does this mean? ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 16:32, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.