Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gursimran Khamba

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 03:55, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gursimran Khamba[edit]

Gursimran Khamba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:NOT. The person is known for one viral video and one podcast. I suggest it should be deleted. Coderzombie (talk) 07:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some more mentioning him as a writer/author:

I believe even most of them doesn't mention him as a sole subject but he is a notable stand-up comedian and writer whose work is recognized by all big and small media channels. The page should be expanded to include more information on him. Mr RD 10:49, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -Well, references provided above are having only short/passing mentions and many are "by" subject not "about" subject. But I am able to find some that may help subject to meet the WP:BIO and WP:GNG standard such as, -[2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. One however is required to use these refs to expand the existing article. I am also not sure about deletion rationale made by nominator. May I know how does it actually falls into -"WP:NOT" guideline? Is it a spam or something I am missing? Or are they suggesting WP:BLP2E criteria for being notable for only two event (one viral video and one podcast)? Anyway, please take a look at sources provided in this comment. Thank you! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 19:50, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 10:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 04:45, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Anupmehra has listed lot of reliable sources that warrant an article about the person in Wikipedia. Easily passes WP:GNG. EthicallyYours! 11:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.