Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenbelt (video game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:16, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greenbelt (video game)[edit]

Greenbelt (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find video game sources: "Greenbelt (video game)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Article created by developer and added to by its "artist". Even this, which is cited to in the article, indicates that the game is barely releasable let alone notable. Bbb23 (talk) 23:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No reliable sources found on Googling this. Ethically (Yours) 12:55, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Essentially, per above. WP:TOOSOON to be able to pass WP:GNG. No independent sources. (For reference, IndieDB is self-published.) WP:CRYSTAL as an unreleased games. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 11:52, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.