Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gowachin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gowachin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic doesn't establish notability, and it is nothing more than a plot summary. TTN (talk) 22:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't there some article into which that this can be merged? bd2412 T 22:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:26, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:25, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. I suppose it could be merged into the novels. Unless someone can turn up in-depth discussions from science fiction magazines of the 1970s, I can't see any independent notability. This sort of excessive detail belongs on Wikia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.