Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorat's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 18:31, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gorat's[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the assertion of notability seems to be is that a notable person likes it. HOw does it meet notability? Boleyn (talk) 16:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:07, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:07, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:07, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – for better or for worse, the restaurant has received substantial coverage in reliable sources: see 1, 2, 3, and 4. Not all of these focus on Buffett, and in any event it isn't really relevant why something has been covered by reliable sources as long as coverage exists. There's enough sourcing to meet the GNG and even WP:NCORP, and that's good enough for me. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above, there are several good sources to give it a pass for GNG. Slovenichibo (talk) 08:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as there are plenty of sources specifically about the restaurant. The picture on the article looks massively unappealing so I feel notability is undeserved, but its there. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as there are enough sources for GNG.Jackattack1597 (talk) 12:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.