Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goodrich Community Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goodrich Community Primary School[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources talking about the subject in significant detail found in a WP:BEFORE search. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. SK2242 (talk) 14:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 14:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 14:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, searching for usable sources in Google, GNews and GBooks gave no useful results to establish notability. Fram (talk) 14:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT). Subject lacks WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth. There is basic, run of the mill, routine, normal, coverage. Sources in article are not IS RS with SIGCOV. BEFORE revealed nothing. // Timothy :: talk 19:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable primary school, fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sorry lads, this is of architectural interest. One reference provided. It is of educational interest as it was built as all-through school- not a primary school. WP:IS just isn't an issue if it has an Ofsted report. Wikishootme shows our coverage of South London is poor, suggesting a delete will make it worse. I haven't found any architects drawings of the original buildings yet but they ddo seem to be more extensive than a standard London triple decker. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClemRutter (talk • contribs) 10:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG, WP:NSCHOOL, WP:SIGCOV, WP:NBUILD, WP:NBUILDING, and WP:GEOFEAT. Tennis Anyone?^Talk 16:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Fails WP:NSCHOOL, the school does not satisfy notability. Alex-h (talk) 11:25, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete totally fails notability for a school, and there are not enough sources to show its architecture is of not either.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:18, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.