Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gogh Van Go
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles 22:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gogh Van Go[edit]
- Gogh Van Go (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I just contested a PROD which had as its reason "The article gives no indication of notability, and the groups seems to fail the notability requirements of WP:BAND. The article also cites no references". I found and added three sources after a quick search. They're not good sources (two are Amazon, and the other is just a music catalog site of some sort), but they make it look like there are 2 commercial albums out there - though I've no idea if the labels are themselves notable. Anyway, at the very least, I think it needs AfD rather than PROD. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:38, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Added referenced notation to the band's 1995 JUNO Award win for Best Video. --Rburriel (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Added numerous newspaper sourced references with proper annotations. --Rburriel (talk) 23:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Montreal Gazette, Billboard magazine and the JUNO Awards are pretty reliable and verifiable sources. I think we can put this matter to rest now. --Rburriel (talk) 16:33, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - passes WP:BAND as having gained canada's highest award and undertaken a North American tour. Bearian (talk) 00:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - in addition to the above, I also found this article. -- Whpq (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.