Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Privacy Control

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Do Not Track. Consensus not have a separate article right now. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 10:12, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global Privacy Control[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been moved directly into article space by a declared conflict of interest editor, bypassing the review process. Declined once by User:Theroadislong: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_Privacy_Control&type=revision&diff=996625531&oldid=996624675&diffmode=source Rejected then by User:Hatchens https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_Privacy_Control&type=revision&diff=996682762&oldid=996631124&diffmode=source Moved into article space anyway by User:Danielkn609 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_Privacy_Control&type=revision&diff=997943329&oldid=996682762&diffmode=source The author may, as the edit summary says, be requesting to resubmit the page for consideration again, but the action is not a resubmission, but a move into article space.

Moving this back into draft space again would be move-warring. Recommending a move into draft space, but submitting to the community for consensus. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. No second opinion is needed! -Hatchens (talk) 06:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Do Not Track - WP:TOOSOON for a full article, but could have a sentence as a proposed successor to DNT. If this becomes a real standard we can always recreate. Jumpytoo Talk 06:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Do Not Track: It would be appropriate as a section in that article, until this is expanded. I think the topic warrants coverage somewhere, irregardless of the COI issues. ~RAM (talk) 07:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Do Not Track: It's best to discuss it in the target article. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 14:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Do Not Track per above. // Timothy :: talk 15:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.