Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilles Martin (businessman)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star Mississippi 16:36, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gilles Martin (businessman)[edit]

Gilles Martin (businessman) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was tagged as WP:G11. In looking at the article, I felt that the only real notability for Martin was his company. Being a billionaire in and of itself does not confer notability. So I redirected the article to the company, but the author reverted that, so here we are. Bbb23 (talk) 22:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:59, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:59, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The articles in Le Monde and several of the other sources are about Martin rather than his company, and are enough for notability.----Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Not sure why the article was tagged as blatantly promotional. There aren't any specific notability standards delineated for entrepreneurs/businesspeople, so in all honesty, I presumed the subject would be notable on the grounds that they are one of the richest people in their country and the founder of quite an influential company. Not to mention the press coverage from a number of reliable sources... Mooonswimmer (talk)
  • Keep Being billionaire is not a notability factor, but there are some good coverage here such as the ones in lesechos.fr, lemonde.fr and entreprendre.fr. Chelokabob (talk) 09:04, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, There is enough coverage and he is notable as the founder of the company.This article also exists in French Wikipedia. Alex-h (talk) 13:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep seems enough RS for him to be notable, including feature article in Le Monde. Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: clearly notable...hard to see why this article was even tagged? - Ret.Prof (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.