Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George F. Engel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

George F. Engel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination. Article was prodded but is ineligible due to a previous prod being removed in September 2009. Prod rationale this time around was "Non notable per WP:MILPEOPLE, see recent AFDs, such as those for Henry Blomberg and Daniel Martin. No other information found in a Google/Google books search"

I am neutral. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Thank you Kuyabribri, I hadn't realized that it was prodded before. However, I still think that the subject is non-notable per my rationale for the prod. Dana boomer (talk) 15:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG, WP:MILPEOPLE and precedent established in previous AfDs, such as those mentioned above. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 01:42, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per the precedent set in the two AFDs mentioned above in the nomination and the various policies cited. — AustralianRupert (talk) 12:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.