Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation M: Misogyny in Media & Culture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Generation M: Misogyny in Media & Culture[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, independent release with no known verifiable reviews. Seems entirely written by the filmmaker or an associate. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have cited a couple of reviews in the article. I am not sure whether we have enough for notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep as it does now have some references to scholarly reviews, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The scholarly reviews demonstrate notability. — Toughpigs (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 21:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: passes WP:NFO#1 with two reviews, and there's another review in Library Journal that can be added ([1] for those with ProQuest access). — Bilorv (talk) 16:29, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.