Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation Hope

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Generation Hope[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article on a political party has had no sources for the preceding 11 years. As a party which has failed to win any parliamentary seats it doesn't qualify under WP:POLOUTCOMES or WP:NPOL. A search on Google Books, Google News, newspapers.com, and JSTOR fails to find any coverage. Chetsford (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 21:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 21:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 18:07, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a website claims they got 336 votes in the 2006 National Assembly election. Nothing in the article is verifiable. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:22, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced, fails WP:GNG per nom. SportingFlyer talk 07:44, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.