Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeminiJets

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ . plicit 14:27, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GeminiJets[edit]

GeminiJets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Ref 1 is not independent (interview), refs 2 through 4 are directly from the company's website (or archives of the site), ref 5 can be considered WP:ROUTINE as the COVID-19 pandemic affected many companies, not just this one. Uhai (talk) 21:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 16:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. None of the sources in the article are IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE showed promo material.  // Timothy :: talk  19:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete None of the various sources meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 19:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.