Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galatasaray S.K. 0–7 Güneş S.K.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 21:09, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Galatasaray S.K. 0–7 Güneş S.K.[edit]

Galatasaray S.K. 0–7 Güneş S.K. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AfD per discussion at Project Football relating to the enduring notability of a game which is just the highest scoring in a given series. This is another instance, where if another game was to be higher scoring it would just replace this, functionally meaning its enduring notability is in question per WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT.

The notability of this event appears to be tied to the largest defeat for a club (Galatasaray). The 3 linked sources, 2 are to summary scorelines, and the other just has a passing sentence which boils down to "they had their biggest defeat". Seems distinctly WP:ROUTINE. Two books are listed, but unclear what content is derived from them that might confer significant coverage.

Courtesy ping for those on football talk page and editors that have contributed to this page recently: @Govvy, Nehme1499, GiantSnowman, ChrisTheDude, Ortizesp, No Great Shaker, C.Fred, Akocsg, and KingSkyLord: Koncorde (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Koncorde (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Koncorde (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Koncorde (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and discussion at FOOTY. As the highest scoring game in a series, it is potentially a moving target and that isn't a sound basis for inclusion here. Individual matches need lasting reasons for inclusion as standalone articles – for example, a cup final. Thanks for the ping, Koncorde. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:43, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper 16:55, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:N "Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article." As such, my view is that this should be noted in higher level articles, eg 1938 Turkish National Division, especially since this level of detail is not required. Nigej (talk) 06:39, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 07:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As per nom and all above, fails notability criteria. Purosinaloense T/K 18:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As per nom. Sonofstar (talk) 16:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence that this particular football match has enough enduring notability to warrant a stand-alone article. Not a final or a record-breaking match so not inherently notable Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no evidence Aloolkaparatha (talk) 09:59, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - we don't need articles on individual clubs' biggest ever victory/defeat. Overall record victory/defeat for a country/league maybe yes, but definitely not for each individual club...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:11, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.