Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabrielle Geiselman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 06:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gabrielle Geiselman[edit]
- Gabrielle Geiselman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
An SPA's article on a youngish photographer who has verifiably done work that is good or commercial or both (and that, in my unimportant opinion, shows promise). The trouble is all of the content is sourced to Geiselman herself or to similarly dodgy places. Geiselman appears on sites that will profile photographers who want to be profiled, she appears in Flickr, etc., but none of this adds up to much. Meanwhile, I don't yet see any mention of a solo exhibition or of a book, and I certainly don't see substantial critical commentary. -- Hoary (talk) 03:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History of photography-related deletion discussions. —Hoary (talk) 03:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unless good third-party sources come to light. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 04:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Ned Scott 04:46, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Gsearch turns up a distinct lack of sources showing notability. 0 gnews hits; 0 SFGate hits (the web site for her hometown newspaper); 0 LA Times hits (the newspaper where she currently lives).--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. no independent notability given. Mukadderat (talk) 15:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.