Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaadha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:44, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gaadha[edit]

Gaadha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a film that was supposed to have been completed by around 2013 but appears to have never been released. A quick search comes up with a similarly-named film (Krishna Gaadi Veera Prema Gaadha) in 2016, but with none of the same production/cast. I don't think that this film and the other one are the same. The sources named in the article are about the production of the film. As it stands, there is no speedy criteria for incomplete or otherwise undistributed films, so this is getting nom'd under WP:NFF. Jip Orlando (talk) 21:10, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 00:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 00:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and update or redirect to producer-The title of this film had me thinking about the similar sounding Bengali word . On a serious note this film did attarct good coverage (Hindu,TOI,Indian Express) but did not take off (thus got less coverage) — FR+ 16:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment but per NFF: "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles...". The sources cited (and indeed, the sparse information that is out there for this film) do not mention anything about principal photography. The best I can come up with is that the film production was put on indefinite hiatus. Also, per the same guideline, "...films that have already begun shooting, but not have yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable...", thus my nomination for deletion. Jip Orlando (talk) 17:48, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.