Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futsal positions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 03:17, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Futsal positions[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTHOWTO, WP:IINFO. Tagged for sources and cleanup since 2010. Deprodded without comment. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:02, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Lists. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:02, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and also WP:NOR. The only thing of any little value is that image of the positions which would suit the main article, all the rest is unencyclopedic and doesn't belong anywhere. Ajf773 (talk) 23:54, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:IINFO. Been more than a decade that nothing good has been done with the article. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 17:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not needed. Giant Snowman 19:08, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As er nom, it fails WP:IINFO. MickyShy (talk) 10:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question - If this page should be deleted per the above arguments, why not Basketball positions, Baseball positions, and American football positions? I don't see how you could want to delete this one and not those. A used book search comes up with many how-to books on futsal, which discuss the positions. Now, I agree the article itself sucks! But AfD is not about whether the sources are in the article, but whether the sources exist, and just clicking on the book search above shows lots of potential sources. Jacona (talk) 21:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep futsal is an internationally renowned sport, not sure what value there is in deleting this.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The current article violates large portions of WP:NOT, so even if notability were marginal it should not be kept under the guidance of WP:N. — Mhawk10 (talk) 02:36, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.