Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furman Stewart Baldwin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Furman Stewart Baldwin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. All biographical information is unsourced and there is no discussion of him in any reliable sources. In fact, a search for him comes up with Amazon/ebay links to buy the kissing photograph mentioned in the article, but no other sources. Entire article is unsourced, likely written by a family member. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 15:14, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note - there was a failed PROD in 2009 - otherwise this would have been candidate for proposed deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 15:15, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 15:14, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - An online search brought up nothing in the way of sigcov in reliable sources. I found only social media, a couple blogs, and eBay sites selling posters. Fails notability criteria for GNG, BASIC, and NARTIST. Article creator may be a family member as mentioned in the nom. Netherzone (talk) 15:52, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the one source is not even close to enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:24, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as no sources can be found. -- Hoary (talk) 03:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No significant coverage in reliable sources. Less Unless (talk) 10:00, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.