Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funstock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus was that the article lacked reliable sources (primarily press releases) and was excessively promotional. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Funstock[edit]

Funstock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Darkness Shines (talk) 09:05, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some site references now which refer to the site activity. The site has featured prominently in major print publications but not so many online. I hope this is sufficient to avoid deletion. You can do a quick search for both brands and you will see they are reputable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megaman47 (talkcontribs) 09:26, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.