Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Store

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 15:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Free Store[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real independent evidence of notability. Not every university service is notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero coverage from actual sources, not notable. Stikkyy (talk) (contributions) 04:40, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable and basically entirely promotional. Triptothecottage (talk) 06:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Triptothecottage. Dunready (talk) 07:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing special. Article is overly promotional and overstates the importance of the store. There should actually be an article on the many "Free Stores" around the world, like this one in Canada.198.58.162.200 (talk) 16:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like that article exists. Suggest pointing "Free Store" to said article.198.58.162.200 (talk) 16:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the page up. We have improved our sources, and believe the store is notable because of the incredible amount of waste diversion it provides every year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asavoie (talk • contribs) 23:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The value of free stores in general is specified in the generic article. Neither the original version nor the current version provides any specific reason why this particular free store is notable. User:Asavoie - Who is "we"? Accounts should represent one human being. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant reliable coverage.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.