Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Potts (film director)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DrKiernan (talk) 19:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Potts (film director)[edit]

Fred Potts (film director) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Potts is a non-notable filmmaker, and at best, a footnote in Dana Plato's story. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:14, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:29, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:29, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'KEEP' Fred Potts is not non-notable. he was not just a footnote in Dana Plato's life, he was engaged to be married to her. If this is just a footnote of someone life then WikiDan61 has a small life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viktoriasoviet (talkcontribs)
  • Keep does not meet WP:DEL-REASON. Romantic interests in Dana Plato pending marriage is notable. Mango 03:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC) Mangoclowns (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Delete WP:INHERITED, WP:BLP1E. A search for sources is difficult due to the genuinely notable war hero of the same name, but I don't think there's anything out there. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 04:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 19:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.