Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frankenstein (2015 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. There is consensus that the article can not stay in the mainspace for the time being. We choose then between incubation, userfication and redirect. A redirect preserves the history and gives a chance to make a merge if anybody wants to.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frankenstein (2015 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFF. Bbb23 (talk) 03:13, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Frankenstein#Films.2C_plays_and_television. As far as I can tell, filming has not yet commenced on this movie, although they seem to have cast most of the major players. That's enough to where I'd suggest merging a little bit of information into the main article's F/P/T section. We can keep the history so there will be something to pull from when/if it does start filming and we can un-redirect it at that point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:22, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The director's twitter says differently. Take this as you wish. Guy546^(Talk) 05:31, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Also this, (an industry website) also says filming began on the 25th, so that is also a source to go off of. Guy546^(Talk) 05:56, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - That sources calls it the "untitled Frankenstein project" which began shooting. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

INCUBATE temporarily per deletion policy's suggested "alternatives to deletion" as being just a tad TOO SOON. While we can accept it has begun filming and that, due to topic and principals, it will quite likely be found notable enough within a few months to be a reasonable exception to guideline, per WP:NFF (paragraph 3) it does not yet have quite enough persistent coverage to merit being an exception to guideline. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Userify as premature. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy would be good alternative. I agree it's WP:TOO SOON, but when the film is done and if it's notable and there is enough sources, we could have it back without unnecessarily losing data. Alex^{discussion ★} 00:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and partial merge per Tokyogirl79, pending more coverage. Userfy makes sense only if the user wants it in their userspace. Sandstein 10:06, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.