Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag lists that should have been on Commons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flag lists that should have been on Commons[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These pages should be been moved to Commons except the Brazilian one since too long that it had to be split into states on Commons. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 00:17, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the lists (that looked like galleries) looked like Commons gallery pages that should be (or already had been) transferred to Commons:

List of city flags in Argentina (gallery list already on Commons)
List of city flags in Belarus (gallery list already on Commons)
Lists of Belgian municipal flags (gallery list already on Commons)
List of Canadian municipal flags (gallery list already on Commons)
List of comunal flags in Chile (gallery list already on Commons)
List of city flags in Colombia (gallery list already on Commons)
List of city flags in Croatia (gallery list already on Commons)
List of city flags in Ecuador (gallery list already on Commons)
List of comunal flags in France (gallery list already on Commons)
List of city flags in Hungary (gallery list already on Commons)
List of municipal flags of Puerto Rico (gallery list already on Commons)
List of city flags in Poland (gallery list already on Commons) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.3.39.219 (talk) 11:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Flags of populated places of Ukraine (gallery list already on Commons)
and everything on Template:Lists of city flags. Save for some countries like Malta for example since it is linked to List of flags of Malta and Japan's as had they had some info. They can be recreated if info about the designs and adoption were added.

Who's with me on this nom? SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 00:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Brazil. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:40, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note for context: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flags of cities of the United States; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of municipal flags in the Czech Republic; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flags of counties of the United States. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And Delete all for the same reasons given at those AfDs, namely the blatant NOT failure and the fact these are categories-masquerading-as-articles which I think are probably also duplicates of existing Commons categories. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all These are not functionally articles, and we have no gain from the non-article collection of images.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:12, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Per WP:LISTCRUFT, it is the list of gallery of images of flags that is actually unnecessary, and was already in Wikimedia Commons. 180.214.233.94 (talk / contribs) 21:38, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all There is no need to create this article. per nom. JoyStick101 (talk) 06:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all 'cause duplicates of Commons cats. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 09:04, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. GreenC 18:33, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. Gabe114 (talk) 18:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.