Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Festival du Film Merveilleux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Festival du Film Merveilleux[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 20:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Film, Magic, Events, and France. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would say Keep. I removed a few things. Cleanup is still necessary. And update. Added a few sources that seem to prove it is notable. The full name is "Festival du Film Merveilleux et Imaginaire". -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 00:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG. A gnews search comes up mainly with www.sortiraparis.com which is an event listing website. LibStar (talk) 04:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 07:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

weak Keep poorly sourced but IMO notable. Llajwa (talk) 16:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how is it notable? In what way does it meet notability criteria? LibStar (talk) 22:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 20:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Libstar. Okoslavia (talk) 18:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist for clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG, sources in article are promo, primary, not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, BEFORE found nothing and the above keeps provide no sources to eval. // Timothy :: talk 02:52, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.