Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicity Heath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Felicity Heath[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No actual assertions of notability here. An actress of no significant accomplishment goes on to be a blogger of no significant accomplishment (except perhaps to be mentioned in someone else's blog post), and gets a picture of herself taken by a famous photographer. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—Agreed, G-News search turns up nothing, no reliable sources found in other searches which cover this person. Fails GNG. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 18:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of significant reliable and independent sources. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 18:08, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete no significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 12:29, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.