Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farhad Azizi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Azizi Bank. Liz Read! Talk! 01:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Farhad Azizi[edit]

Farhad Azizi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been a mess since day one. Creation by a WP:UPE. Moved to draft space a few times in need of incubation. Sources reflect an active business, but provide no notability about the business owner, the subject of the article. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:31, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The WordsmithTalk to me 00:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge a lot of this is just boosterism but some of it could be merged into Azizi Bank. Mccapra (talk) 06:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 11:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge: a properly source short summary into Azizi Bank. BLP, per nom Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing. Sourcing is all focused on the merge target, with interviews with subject. Fails WP:IS, fails NOTINHERITED. While it does not have sourcing for a stand alone article, it can be summarized into the target, and if sourcing develops, it can be split out. Above history shows SALT might help.  // Timothy :: talk  04:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.