Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fantastic Four (Golden State Warriors)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:22, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Fantastic Four (Golden State Warriors)[edit]
- Fantastic Four (Golden State Warriors) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Topic fails WP:GNG, with lack of reliable sources with significant coverage on this grouping. The title is a neologism based on one basketball player, Kevin Durant, who was just acquired by the Golden State Warriors, but is not scheduled to play for a few months when the 2016–17 season begins. The best I can find on web searches on the term are a few t-shirts being sold, and unreliable blogs. —Bagumba (talk) 18:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. —Bagumba (talk) 18:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The term is a neologism at best, original research at worse. The prose is covered by the appropriate section of Golden State Warriors. -- Tavix (talk) 19:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Neologism. The section in the team article is also a bit premature, since the era has not started yet. Thoughtmonkey (talk) 20:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable neologism. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This isn't a real thing that gets consistent coverage. Rikster2 (talk) 11:57, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete not a real term. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 15:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete an insignificant neologism. Lepricavark (talk) 04:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.