Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabio Ulderici

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Courcelles (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fabio Ulderici[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Fabio Ulderici (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and BIO. BEFORE showed promo, database, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).  // Timothy :: talk  03:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of the above is IS RS with SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk  14:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Summarizing what's on the links isn't discrediting the page, you are just highlighting that he is getting significant coverage.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, clearly passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Per above. Young manager with ongoing career at elite women's level... Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Article needs sources. we have none. Oaktree b (talk) 03:24, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails GNG with a lack of significant coverage. Managers being hired and fired is routine coverage. The sources relating to his sacking at Parma largely quote from a press release from Parma. Dougal18 (talk) 12:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of any sort of extensive coverage in RS. Name drops and one lines don't cut it for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 12:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the policy that is being missed here, is ROUTINE doesn't extend to extensive articles about firing the coach. Here's another one. Nfitz (talk) 17:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The online coverage is almost entirely derived from club's press releases and press conferences (most of them from his hiring by Empoli or Parma, or from his firing by Parma); it is NOT independent of the subject because it comes directly from him or his employer. The best coverage I could find was this but it is still highly derivative of the club's press release and the subject's own statements. If this manager was really notable, I would expect to find some coverage of his success at Empoli (post-hiring) or something about his struggles at Parma (pre-firing); but I could not (except for routine match reports). Jogurney (talk) 15:03, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Insufficient non-routine coverage to meet WP:NBIO. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Alvaldi (talk) 10:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 20:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Found not much coverage other than news about teams changing their coach. Even if we accept those as suitable sources, there are still too little to write about. The subject can be mentioned in the articles of the teams he coached, a stand alone article is not necessary. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete What sources exist don't have significant coverage, most are routine or are passing while talking of the team. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 17:48, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - most of the coverage is unsatisfactory. For example, Forza Parma is clearly not an independent, reliable source being a fan site. Total Italian Football appears to be reliable but the coverage is mostly about Parma's results and does not really address Ulderici in detail as an individual. The deletion arguments are stronger here and every source brought forward has been dismissed based on guidelines. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fabio_Ulderici&oldid=1153823723"