Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FC Morkovice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Consensus established for GNG and SIGCOV. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FC Morkovice[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NORG criteria. The club has never played in a professional Czech competition (top two tiers), not even in the 3rd tier. FromCzech (talk) 13:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Football, and Czech Republic. FromCzech (talk) 13:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per sources at cs:FC Morkovice Govvy (talk) 16:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which exactly? There are only brief mentions and result databases, if I see correctly. FromCzech (talk) 17:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @FromCzech: I said weak keep per the combination of the sources on that article and some other stuff online like, [1], [2], there is are a couple of sources that have bits here and there, match reports and such. Not exactly SIGNOV, but a basic passing for GNG in my opinion. Although the sourcing is pretty broken on the other wiki article. I said weak keep, but saying that, it can go the other way, I just felt maybe enough around. Govvy (talk) 19:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not Czech, but there has never been a criterion mandating that a club has played on the two highest levels. I pity the state of Czech media if nobody has written about this. Geschichte (talk) 14:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I'm not 100% convinced, but willing to AGF the info below about there being other sources out there, in addition to the ones already located. Giant Snowman 19:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per Govvy. Searching up "FC Morkovice site:idnes.cz" and "FC Morkovice site:denik.cz" turn up some results . Article needs imprvement, not deltion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Govvy provided a database with results for betting and a wikipedia mirror. Idnes.cz is actually rajce.idnes.cz, which is a platform for sharing photos. So the only reasonable sources could be from denik.cz, but articles like "football players' brawl" do not seem to me to be proof of notability. The article would need improvement only if there was anything to draw from. FromCzech (talk) 11:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per @FromCzech. The club is from lower divisions and do not appear to have the material to support WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - despite being from a lower level, as noted above, there is material that supports WP:SIGCOV. In addition to what's been provided/discussed above, there's media coverage about some of their bigger games - such as this. Nfitz (talk) 20:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - in addition to the material noted by @Nfitz, I was able to find another reference, both of which I have incorporated into the article. As @Das osmnezz mentioned above, this article needs improvement, not deletion. C 679 12:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's probably time to ping the User:GreatestSnowman. :) Nfitz (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.