Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme points of Afro-Eurasia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Afro-Eurasia. Kurykh (talk) 19:41, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extreme points of Afro-Eurasia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Afro-Eurasia is not a widely used division of the world. The extreme points of which are trivial and not well-enough discussed to meet notability guidelines. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nominator. Redundant to Extreme points of Eurasia and Extreme points of Africa. --LukeSurl^{t c} 15:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Afro-Eurasia (which should itself be merged with Old World, but that's a different question). NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:58, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Afro-Eurasia as per the merge template I added atop the article just prior to this nomination. Afro-Eurasia may not be a widely-used term, but it is an encyclopedic term. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Afro-Eurasia. Should only take a moment. Afro-Eurasia / Old World / World Island is a reasonably notable concept, the article is short, and this material should fit right in. Herostratus (talk) 16:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.