Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Events held at the Arena Zagreb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:37, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Events held at the Arena Zagreb[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list is clearly against WP:INDISCRIMINATE. We don't need a record of every event held at this arena, especially since the more notable events are already listed that the parent article (Arena Zagreb). -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Do we really need a dozen separate discussions? Neonchameleon (talk) 12:33, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bundling them together is technically allowed, but since some may be notable and others may not, I think this is the better approach. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete all stadiums in the world hold events, it is not encyclopaedic to list every single event held. LibStar (talk) 14:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Another arbitrary and selective listing by P 1 9 9 from the Category:Lists of events by place. Granted this article is not as well sourced and maintained as some others but it can be improved.Zvonko (talk) 21:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ADHOM is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 12:59, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is exactly the type of non-encyclopaedic list that the guidelines were drafted to avoid. --Bejnar (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with above, clearly an indiscriminate listing. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a centralized discussion at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#List of events by place. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In my view, INDISCRIMINATE is a narrowly worded policy consisting of four or five specific situations and is not obviously applicable to this article. James500 (talk) 06:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NOTPAPER. Indiscriminate doesn't apply, as the list is finite, relatively short and with a clear inclusion criterion, so it doesn't match in any way what INDISCRIMINATE is about. WP:INDISCRIMINATE was created to avoid the project become everything2 or DMOZ; but this is not a "list of all ISP providers in Indiana" or "list of health-related websites". Diego (talk) 07:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 14:33, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.