Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Morris (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of British supercentenarians#Eva Morris. Fails notability guidelines, but redirected as suggested because there was no reason (in policy) not to do so. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 04:24, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Morris[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent notability established beyond her exceptional longevity. We have tables for this. — JFG ^talk 18:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO1E because there is only WP:ROUTINE coverage of her that fails to demonstrate notability and there is no notability guideline that "the oldest x" is notable. The content of the article is pretty much just trivia fluff about her longevity record and the standard longevity advice. There is almost nothing actually said about her in an article that is supposed to be about her, which demonstrates how the article fails WP:NOPAGE. Her age, life dates, and nationality are already recorded on five different lists, where they are easier to view, so this permanent WP:PERMASTUB is not needed. Newshunter12 (talk) 01:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of British supercentenarians#Eva Morris (with the history preserved under the redirect) in lieu of deletion. The nominator notes, "We have tables for this." I recommend that instead of deleting the article's history, we redirect the article to the person's place in the table by adding an anchor to the person's entry. It is useful to preserve the history so that any interested editors can merge content to List of British supercentenarians#Biographies if they think the person deserves more than a mention in the table.
Cunard (talk) 03:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to appropriate list per WP:NOPAGE and WP:PERMASTUB. This article is filled with unnecessary trivia (she rode a bike and smoked). One sentence is devoted to someone who claimed to be older but wasn't authenticated which strains to pad this article. Other than that, she was born, got old and then died. Nothing that isn't easily handled on a list somewhere. CommanderLinx (talk) 12:02, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.