Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Academy of Diplomacy (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

European Academy of Diplomacy[edit]

European Academy of Diplomacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The last AFD was improperly close. I don't understand how the closing admin, User:SarahStierch, could've concluded that my nom, one vote to delete and one comment leaning towards it constitute no consensus. Anyway: self-sourced organization, clearly fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations) as written. Entry is clearly promotional (author: SPA European Academy of Diplomacy (talk · contribs))... Pinging User:Emilyharris and User:Bluerasberry who participated in thart prior AFD. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 23:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The article makes no claim about its subject which satisfies criteria described in WP:N. In addition to this, all presented sources are self-published by the subject of the article. It may be the case that good sources for the subject of this article may exist in a language other than English, but I have not done any non-English searches. I did a general Google search and a Google News search and saw nothing which looked like a reliable source. Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.