Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Academy of Diplomacy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Feel free to renominate if you wish. SarahStierch (talk) 01:19, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

European Academy of Diplomacy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am no seeing how this is passing Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). I am not seeing that this NGO has generated any significant coverage in reliable media. It's biggest claim to fame is that it has notable members, but I don't think that's enough - it's not doing anything to be notable. PS. Article was originally created by European Academy of Diplomacy (talk · contribs), so it's clear the intent was promotional. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:13, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 03:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:42, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

they need to cite the sources. it looks impressive as a list and may have merit but it needs the links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emilyharris (talk • contribs) 18:27, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete An organization's notability is determined by what others say about the organization, and not by what it says about itself. I am concerned that sources covering this organization may exist in another language, but to be on English Wikipedia some sources have to be identified and I am not readily seeing them in English. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:39, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.