Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethel Davis (diplomat)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Ethel Davis (diplomat)[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ethel Davis (diplomat) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. No significant coverage. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. LibStar (talk) 02:30, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Africa, Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Norway, and Sweden. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I have added in coverage of her work, primarily during the 2014 Ebola virus epidemic in Liberia. She appears in multiple German news outlets talking about the pandemic, aid from Germany to Liberia, and the personal toll of the epidemic. She was also lead of the Central Bank of Liberia during a 2009 scandal, and received coverage during that period (though she was found not culpable). DaffodilOcean (talk) 21:54, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see enough notability to support a separate page. Maybe one part could be put in Central Bank of Liberia perhaps. But even then best to use talk page for that. ContentEditman (talk) 22:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Information should be added to the Central Bank of Liberia and Ebola virus epidemic in Liberia pages but the argument to keep would be really helped by a German speaker. Gusfriend (talk) 06:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:SIGCOV, as noted by DaffodilOcean. Bearian (talk) 20:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, per DaffodilOcean. /Julle (talk) 01:56, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.