Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erubism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Erubism[edit]
Prod removed, so here we are. Non-notable neologism, WP:OR, and/or WP:MADEUP. Zero relevant Ghits. Ravenna1961 02:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and WP:V. --Brewcrewer 02:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and for violating the fourth tenet of Erubism. LonelyBeacon 03:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Good one. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, fails WP:V, obvious neologism. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per above (NN neo), especially the comment by User:LonelyBeacon. - Rjd0060 04:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:NFT. Hell, speedy delete per WP:SNOW. eaolson 05:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Snow is not one on of the criterion for speedy deletion. --Cyrus Andiron 16:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply I realize that. I'm just saying that this article doesn't have a snowball's chance of surviving the AfD, so let's get rid of it now and move on with our lives. I was mostly just expressing frustration with yet more WP:NFTcruft surviving prod and clogging up the AfD process. eaolson 19:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.