Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eros Innovations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eros Innovations[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant G11, but there's a new editor removing the tags with no other reason than "no consensus". I'm bringing it here because the new editor is edit warring over the tags. Pahunkat (talk) 09:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Pahunkat (talk) 09:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Pahunkat (talk) 09:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Strong keep. Well sourced. Not a hoax. Gungeplunge (talk) 10:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Speedy Delete — Per G11, and also a non notable article on an organization that lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources thus fails WP:ORG. Celestina007 (talk) 10:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as outrageously promotional. For what it's worth, the person who edit warred over the tag has since been blocked as an LTA. Blablubbs|talk 12:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Oaktree b (talk) 16:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed promotional material. Reliable sources on this page include Sports Illustrated, Deadline, Variety, The New York Times, USA Today, Complex, The New York Post, and Forbes. Jakeswish (talk) 19:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The content seems to be about Mike Tyson - as do nearly all the references. I understand the celebrity based business purpose, but one celebrity in this OTT streaming service does not merit notability for WP:ORGCRIT. There is scant information about the business itself. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - whilst some of the promotional language has been corrected, this still does not pass WP:NORG Spiderone 20:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.