Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Dunn (Vine) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Vine (software). The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:57, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Dunn (Vine)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reputable sources. A YouTube uploader with no mainstream references Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Why a 2nd nomination for deletion for this article? The first nomination resulted in NC, with the only vote to delete being later crossed out by the user. The reason "No reputable sources. A YouTube uploader with no mainstream references" is a complete inaccuracy.

1. No reputable sources. (MSN, Tubefilter, Gawker, Complex are all present sources for the article)
2. A YouTube uploader (YouTube is a secondary platform for Dunn, at least have the reason for a 2nd AfD nom have his primary platform included)
3. No mainstream references (see #1)

Soulbust (talk) 20:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Trivial coverage by mainstream sources, and most of the citations go to Facebook, YouTube, or his own personal site. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:03, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trim and Merge to the Vine (software). Plenty of room there to cover the app's most notable participants. Candleabracadabra (talk) 21:24, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Vine (software)... basically per Candleabracadabra. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 16:02, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.