Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equity Award for Most Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Comedy Series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Equity Awards. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Equity Award for Most Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Comedy Series[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

whilst the Equity Awards may be notable, individual subcategories like this may not be. the only hits I could find are WP mirrors. the articles cites its own website. no third party coverage of this actual subcategory.

for the same reasons I am nominating:

These awards have only existed for 2 years, nothing like the Logies.

LibStar (talk) 02:10, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:15, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:15, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - WP:SPINOUT articles for the lead article Equity Awards. Awards with multiple categories usually generate these sorts of lists as sub-articles of the lead article. Merging these large charts of winners and nominees will make the lead article extremely ungainly and, since the presenting organization shows no indication that the awards will be discontinued so the ungainliness of a merged lead article will only get worse over time. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 03:49, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have now also nominated Equity Awards, if the parent is of questionable notability, its subcategories are on shaky ground. LibStar (talk) 04:08, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:33, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge,Looking at the articles, they are not at all too large to merge into a common article for the awards. 'DGG (at NYPL)' (talk) 20:49, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:43, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per DGG. Since the main article has now been kept, the content of these sub-articles should not be deleted. For now, as DGG says, there's room for this content in the main article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:40, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a technical !vote. There is no objection to a merge - the question there is purely an editing one and they might later be demerged in any event. This is not case where the topic is notable only in context; the award stands in its own right and is not dependent on who else was given an award on the night. --AJHingston (talk) 15:53, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.