Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equity Awards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No delete !votes. (Non-admin closure.) Alex^{discussion ★} 01:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Equity Awards[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

these awards that have only existed for 2 years fails WP:GNG. I find hits for "equity awards" not in Australia [1], and trove turns up hardly anything. [2]. nothing in a major Australian news site [3]. note I have also nominated the subcategories of the award which are on shaky ground if the parent is questionably notable. LibStar (talk) 04:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 19. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Offline 04:07, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Could merge to Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance#Awards (Australian Equity is now part of MEAA). --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't support redirect of title, as there are numerous identically named awards in the world. LibStar (talk) 10:52, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment 2 I found a little coverage on specialist websites but not much.[4][5][6][7][8] (Not sure if all of those are WP:RS) --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. At least for the lifetime achievement awards, some coverage in significant media sources like The Age and the Australian Broadcasting Corp. shows up, such as [9][10][11][12]. --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:57, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Arxiloxos. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 16:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Since at least some of the awards are notable, the best place to cover them all is here.'DGG (at NYPL)' (talk) 20:50, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.