Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encounter: Education for Meaning and Social Justice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:59, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Encounter: Education for Meaning and Social Justice[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per Wikipedia:Notability_(periodicals)#Criteria. This journal is published by an org called Great Ideas in Education, with senior editors who are academics at smaller colleges or previous WILEY editors--so fails point 3. No indication of national awards per point 2. I'll group point 1 and 4: googling many of the articles they have published results in one or two citations, or more likely, pdfs of the pieces where it becomes clear that this isn't a publication with national reach. Nole (chat·edits) 16:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Kadzi   (talk) 16:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Flori4nK ^{t • c} 16:51, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. I think the original nominator did an excellent job giving the reasons why this notable and I don't feel the need to repeat them. So, I'll just it at that. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:45, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.