Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanouil Farlekas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanouil Farlekas[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. // Timothy :: talk 05:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 05:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 05:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 05:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I have edited it to include more text from the Greek version. I believe it does now. --Antondimak (talk) 07:59, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2020-07 ✍️ create

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio

10:01, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 05:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, Cewbot. I opposed it. What should I have done so you would have detected the opposition? --Antondimak (talk) 06:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Antondimak, always start your !vote with an * plus the keyword that bots, scripts and tools will recognize. These are: *'''Delete'''', *'''Speedy Delete'''', *'''Keep''', *'''Speedy Keep'''', *'''Merge'''', *'''Redirect'''', and *'''Draftify'''. If you leave a reply, use *'''Reply''' and if you leave a general comment use *'''Comment''' with the correct indentation. Hope this helps. // Timothy :: talk

Thank you. --Antondimak (talk) 06:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.