Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emile Jansen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Emile Jansen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR can't find any independent sources that cover him in depth an autobiography that has been tagged for 13 years.Theroadislong (talk) 14:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Netherlands. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Seems to have coverage in Dutch sources [1] and [2]. Gtranslate of the articles say he's won an acting award, I'd assume that would imply notability. The Dutch and German wiki articles are about as source-less as this one... Oaktree b (talk) 19:48, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Most "local" newspapers in Holland are actually regional. Not the ones used by my AfD friend above. These items are not independent either. The subject is a professional actor who has participated in an impressive (!) amount of media series and units. The problem for encyclopedic notability is that he nowhere led. He remained a professional at work, even where the units in which he acted became famous. That's fine yet moves him to the group of professional actors who are NN for Wikipedia. He is still a great fit for IMDb. gidonb (talk) 07:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.