Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emerald Buddha 46 BC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by Bbb23 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Reason: WP:G5. (non-admin closure) Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Emerald Buddha 46 BC[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Confusingly written, inaccurate, unreferenced article that appears to be about a subject for which an article already exists, Emerald Buddha. Not a plausible search term. --Paul_012 (talk) 02:52, 10 August 2018 (UTC) Paul_012 (talk) 02:52, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:59, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:REDUNDANTFORK. I don´t see anything in this article which could be merged with Emerald Buddha. The text is unsourced and incomprehensible. JimRenge (talk) 11:30, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user has been creating a lot of article that just duplicate existing articles. I'm wondering if there isn't a CIR issue here somewhere. GMG ^talk 12:55, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:16, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:16, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:16, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:16, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:16, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to me as original research since it does not cite any source either in English or Cambodian. The Cambodian author has added a caption section, where s/he mentions the source of this information from her Grandmother. Hence it can be safe to call it as a myth or WP:OR. Emerald Buddha already exists and s/he has also linked this article with it. She possibly considers both items different but I cannot support this article without valid sources. Also I agree that the Cambodian author has WP:CIR problem in writing and understanding English, which may explain why she is disregarding the talk page warnings. Please keep a watch to ban the user if they don't pay heed. --DBig Xray 13:45, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. DBig Xray 14:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. DBig Xray 14:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I note that Emerald Buddha does not give its history before 1434. Assuming this is the same statue, this article smacks of original research. Or perhaps we should let speedy take its course. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:19, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.