Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of New Zealand, Berlin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Germany–New Zealand relations. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of New Zealand, Berlin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Embassies are not inherently notable. There is no significant third party coverage to meet WP:ORG or GNG. LibStar (talk) 00:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Germany, and New Zealand. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:59, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Well, there's a lot more that the article could say. The German article, for example, explores the relationship between New Zealand and East Germany (and although Berlin was the capital of East Germany, although the New Zealand ambassador was based in Vienna). There'd be many German language sources covering the situation from 1953 onwards, most of which are unfortunately not online. The situation is better for East German sources, and here's the announcement that diplomatic relations between East Germany and New Zealand started on 31 May 1974. Schwede 66 02:22, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would that additional information be better placed in Germany–New Zealand relations? LibStar (talk) 02:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think Merge into Germany-New Zealand relations makes sense NealeWellington (talk) 08:36, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, a lot of embassies are notable, this one just doesn't show it. I think merging to Germany–New Zealand relations is a fine editorial decision at the moment, but I would not want this AfD to be used to argue that we should never have a standalone article. —Kusma (talk) 14:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liamyangll (talk to me!) 00:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but preserve - This should probably be listified somewhere, honestly. There's not enough SIGCOV on the building for a stand-alone article, meaning it shouldn't be a stand-alone, and we already have Germany–New Zealand relations. Problem is I'm not sure there's any good place to merge or redirect to? SportingFlyer T·C 18:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, I'm very happy with a merge. I just don't think there's enough for a standalone article right now. SportingFlyer T·C 18:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.