Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emails Angel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Emails Angel[edit]

Emails Angel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

insufficient evidence of notability. Almost all sources are published by the company or press releases DGG ( talk ) 07:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I can't find any reliable sources on the company. Just a bunch of user reviews, but no official tech reviews or anything. SilverserenC 07:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: A WP:SPA article whose references consist of primary links and a review link where this firm is not currently included; nor are multiple searches (Highbeam, Questia, Google) identifying anything better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 09:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 10:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 10:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 10:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


  • We, Wikipedians, Can find references, We can improve this page: My research shows that company exists and has good reputation in the market. Of course, there are no secondary reliable resources but still references can be found and established its notability. We need to take into account that there are many wikipedia pages which have got no references but still they exist. This page ===Emails Angel=== is similar in presentation to those of other pages on email marketing service providers like ===MailChimp=== ===Aweber===. Thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.163.246 (talk) 16:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.