Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddyville Charter School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eddyville Charter School[edit]

Eddyville Charter School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG / WP:NSCHOOL. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth.   // Timothy :: talk  06:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  06:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  06:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete due to lacking multiple in-depth reliable sources about it and therefore failing both WP:GNG and WP:NORG. All the coverage seems to be trivial and local. Not suppressing considering it's an extremely small school in a semi-remote area. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:38, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The people who wrote the guidelines saying all high schools are notable were thinking of suburban, urban and regional high schools with over 500 students, and normally well over 1000 students. They did not think how many truly small schools there are that virtually never get any notice, or how many private and charter schools are very short lived.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.