Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastwick College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:31, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eastwick College[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NSCHOOL, draft article moved by COI editor to mainspace. Greenman (talk) 08:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Greenman (talk) 08:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While it may be possible to pull together an article at some point, this is definitely not it, and the history prior to draftifying is not promising. At this point, the sources are not sufficient, the article reads like marketing copy, and the COI mentioned in nom seems to be confirmed. —siro χ o 09:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Education, and New Jersey. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sorry to say but my attempts to find appropriate supporting materials to cite has been generally unsuccessful. One thing is that the mutliple entities are rarely considered together as a single unit. Further, the 'main campus' and the Hackensack colleges are really separate and distinct things - the former being a nursing college, the second a college of mortuary studies. I'm not saying that one could create a persistent article on either of these, though. Generally lacking in coverage overall. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:18, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.