Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Ricci (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 04:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Ricci[edit]

This article about a photographer was proposed for deletion in 2005, and it was decided to keep and clean it up. It still looks like an advertisement and no independent sources have been added in the meantime to demonstrate his notability. Google only brings up commercial sites. Grahame (talk) 13:36, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 13:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:BIO and WP:RS. -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 14:05, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree, fails WP:BIO and WP:RS. Jenafalt (talk) 15:56, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article is a general biography of a photographer. Wikipedia is not the place for general biographies. The article fails to identify anything particularly noteworthy about Dylan. Does not meet WP:BIO. Totally unsourced material - no references or in-line citations. Dolphin51 (talk) 03:24, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Er, what do you mean by "general biographies"? -- Hoary (talk) 13:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:05, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the man's website has a page of "publications". At least two look as if they might be books. I clicked on both and there was no information on them, just photos. The page of links doesn't seem to include any link about Ricci's work; rather, they're links to other people's homoerotic sites. I can't see any claim of notability even on Ricci's own site. -- Hoary (talk) 13:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.